Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : YEEHAW CANDIDATES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ~digs who wrote (18513)	6/9/2006 3:32:49 PM
From: Galirayo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23958

Well .. Pour me Up a Frosty IPA ... After this week .. Got a Firkin ? redhook.com Cheers !!

To: ~digs who wrote (18513)	6/16/2006 10:44:19 AM
From: Glenn Petersen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23958

In regard to RAE: JUNE 26, 2006 Gene Marcial INSIDE WALL STREET How RAE Sniffs Out Security Leaks Investors scouting undiscovered plays in homeland and industrial security are snapping up RAE Systems (RAE ) (RAE). It makes sensors to detect trace levels of lethal gas and radiation. Julie Chen of New York Global Securities rates the stock, now at 3.80, a buy. Tian Hou of investment bank C.E. Unterberg, Towbin says: "RAE is one of the most important plays in homeland security." In 2004, RAE introduced the world's smallest portable chemical detection device and has since produced a multisensor detector, a wireless chemical sensor network, and a combined chemical and radiological detector. Products to screen cargo and containers have been tested at some U.S. ports, says Chen: "What's unusual is that RAE has captured a big share of the market in both the U.S. and China," she adds. Two U.S. plants generate 52% of sales, and two in China 33%. Chen expects RAE to earn 3 cents a share on sales of $70 million, vs. 1 cents on $60 million in 2005. Note: Unless otherwise noted, neither the sources cited in Inside Wall Street nor their firms hold positions in the stocks under discussion. Similarly, they have no investment banking or other financial relationships with them. By Gene G. Marcial businessweek.com