Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (63260)	6/10/2006 3:11:16 AM
From: shades	Respond to of 110194

Please remember that gold producers will ALWAYS be net short gold. Right - business expense for insurance. I look at speculation in hedge funds and the average joe for a clue. The BIG MISTAKE people make is thinking commercial shorts will "have to cover". That is bullshit. Its like you buy hurricane/flood insurance for your florida house - many people will never use it but you keep spending and hedging against catastrophe - many insurance companies get rich not having claims filed - at least buffet thought so. I only have fire on most of my rentals. This make sense? Yes thanks.

To: mishedlo who wrote (63260)	6/10/2006 1:04:54 PM
From: John McCarthy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 110194

Mish - I enjoy your posts. This statement confuses me. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< The BIG MISTAKE people make is thinking commercial shorts will "have to cover". That is bullshit. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< I better start with: Who are commercial shorts? JP Morgan? The Central Banks? Who? Once thats out of the way - why don't they have to cover? Didn't the guy in Kansas City have to cover on Silver? I know your saying something and that your probably right. But I am missing your point. And would like to see it. regards, John McCarthy