SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68501)6/11/2006 9:49:43 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 173976
 
who controlled senate and house ? answer that question kennyliar



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68501)6/11/2006 9:50:02 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 173976
 
Message 22532463



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68501)6/11/2006 10:44:58 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
June 10-11, 2006 -- On June 12 and 13, WMR will be covering the progressive Democratic "Take Back America" conference in Washington, DC. In anticipation of the conference, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Mike Gravel released the following statement:

How to take back America
By Mike Gravel

"Who is sovereign? He who commits the acts of sovereignty." -- Tocqueville

Next week activists and progressives from around the country will meet in Washington in an effort, as organizers put it, to "take back America." It's always an important conference. But this year, given the state of our politics, it's especially urgent.

At the same time, the determination to set things right suggests an important question: How?

If I may be so bold, despite the fervent desire of most Democrats for "New Vision, New Ideas, and New Energy," it's not clear if the hierarchy in either party is even discussing the kind of fundamental political reform that's needed to truly "take back" the country.

It is a truism nowadays that people are fed up with most of their institutions of government -- not just President Bush, but the Congress as well; and not just Congress's Republican leadership, but with some Democrats too. Polls by John Zogby and others show that voters feel not just a temporary dissatisfaction with this or that policy, but a deep, seething contempt for business as usual, and the whole elected aristocracy that conducts it.

It is from that perspective that Democrats and progressives need to address the issues of political mismanagement in 2006 and beyond. We face a political crisis of confidence in our elected representatives generally, indeed, in the system itself.

Consider, for example, Mr. Bush's war in Iraq. It is fine, and it is right, for Democrats to criticize the mismanagement of this war today. Yet in 2002 and 2003, the country watched as most Republicans and many Democrats in Congress accepted uncritically the intelligence fed to them. In the years since, both houses have fully funded the Iraq war.

Where were the filibusters? Where, in the face of obvious distortions and selective presentation of intelligence, was the release of vital information on the rush to war, on the House or Senate floor? What did our elected representatives do to stop the war they have acquiesced in ever since?

Americans may rightly wonder, after this abdication of responsibility, whether either party, or any branch of the existing government, has the courage to handle the task of deciding issues of war and peace. A much better solution, for this war and future wars, is to redistribute the authority for war and peace to those who will bear the burden of the fighting -- to the people.

The same observation applies to the progressive agenda on domestic policy. All decry the distortion of data that went into Mr. Bush's ill-named "reform" of Medicare for prescription drugs. But having said that, Congress seems unable to rouse itself to hold the perpetrators responsible -- let alone, reverse the costly mistake it led to. Similarly, we all bemoan the bungling of Katrina by the Bush Administration -- but Congress, state, and local governments failed too.

From taxes to energy policy, all can see the vast price imposed by Mr. Bush's tax-and-spend, tax-and-make-war policy. But does anyone really expect the kind of fundamental changes needed in the U.S. tax code to pass through the Senate Finance Committee -- whoever chairs it? Does anyone think that changing a few votes -- or tinkering again with campaign spending rules -- will remove the choke-hold that well-funded interests have on policy debates from energy to Social Security, when all they need to do is sway a few well-placed elites to alter, or simply not hold, a vote?

It is tempting to blame our current leaders in Washington, from the Republicans to their feeble enablers on the Democratic side. The fault, however, my fellow progressives and my fellow citizens, lies not only with our leaders but with ourselves. And the answer, as well, lies with us.

For real political change, Americans must change politics. It seems self-evident, if you think about it. It's ironic, that at a time of unprecedented agreement that politics itself is broken, one hears virtually no discussion of "New Vision, New Ideas" for political reform.

The only way for Americans to really take back America is to take back some of the initial lawmaking power they are implicitly granted in the constitution, in both the preamble and in Article VII -- and that is their fundamental, human right under natural law, as expressed by the Declaration. That means, simply, a process of National Initiative, under which the people can propose and vote on laws directly at the federal level -- as they do in half the states, and most cities and towns, today.

As one of my colleagues has put it: It's the culture of representative government, stupid. As the Federalist observed: "The people can never willfully betray their own interests; but they may possibly be betrayed by the representatives of the people."

Recently, a young man sent me a very troubling email. His message should concern every American, but especially Democrats and progressives.

The young man said he believes the country is in great peril under the Bush war policy -- but that the Congress, whether Republican or Democrat, will never have the guts to reverse it, or to stop future preemptive wars. He said we need a fundamental change in our disgracefully complex tax code -- but it will never pass.

He said he'd like to receive Social Security someday -- but doesn't expect to. He said something needs to be done about global warming -- but hasn't, over 20 years of Republican and Democratic presidents and congresses.

In short, this young man believes certain fundamental changes are necessary -- but that our government, or the politicians who occupy it, cannot make those changes. The implication, as one columnist in the Washington Post suggested earlier this year, is that "representative democracy itself" is failing.

If I could arrange for an airplane to appear over the America's Future Conference next week and skywrite one message, it would be this: "If the people cannot make laws, we can never take back the country."

Take back America? Yes, we must.

But if we try to do it purely through the organs of representative government, then almost none of the changes we seek are possible.

If instead we make the people lawmakers -- if the people themselves rise up and walk, into their just and natural right to legislate, by enacting the National Initiative -- then almost nothing is impossible.

(Mike Gravel was U.S. Senator from Alaska, 1969-1981, and is founder of the National Initiative movement, www.nationalinitiative.us, to establish the people's right to legislate. He is a candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for president in 2008.) www.gravel2008.us

waynemadsenreport.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68501)6/11/2006 3:19:23 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 173976
 
Dollars and Dreams: Immigrants as Prey
By GARY RIVLIN
SAN FRANCISCO

IT was when his immigration attorney asked him for $3,000 several years ago that Celso Lima Mejia started to wonder whether his lawyer was taking him for a very costly ride. Mr. Mejia, a Guatemalan immigrant who was residing illegally in the United States, said he had already paid Miguel Gadda $3,600 to help him apply for asylum. Mr. Mejia recalled in a recent interview that Mr. Gadda promised him that the legal fees — a large chunk of his annual pay of about $20,000 as a handyman — would land him a coveted prize: a green card allowing him to come out from the shadows and live in the United States as a permanent resident.

But immigration authorities rejected the application, and Mr. Mejia said Mr. Gadda pressed him for the extra $3,000 to appeal the decision. Until that point, Mr. Mejia said, Mr. Gadda had done virtually no work on the case — "He hadn't even done any prep work with me before my hearing" — but his asylum application had revealed him to immigration authorities. Mr. Mejia, who is now 29, felt that he had to keep fighting, so he scrounged up the money. And that was the last time he saw Mr. Gadda.

When Mr. Mejia found a deportation order in his mail in 2001, he rushed in panic to his lawyer's office. "But the office wasn't there anymore, and there was nowhere to find him," said Mr. Mejia, who gained permanent resident status — his green card — after turning to a second lawyer he described as "my angel."

Mr. Mejia wasn't Mr. Gadda's only victim. When the State Bar of California disbarred Mr. Gadda in 2002, it cited him for professional misconduct and legal incompetence involving eight illegal immigrants he had advised. (Mr. Mejia's case was not among them.)

Mr. Gadda is hardly alone. As the number of illegal immigrants in the country has swollen to what the Department of Homeland Security conservatively estimates at nine million, so have the ranks of those who inhabit the immigration business's underbelly, posing as well-meaning advisers to those in search of a new job, a new home and a green card if not full citizenship. Immigrants, strangers in a foreign land for whom a green card means a ticket to a fuller life, are ideal prey for con artists and would-be consultants out for a quick buck.

ANALYSTS, lawyers and immigration specialists say that the current debate over immigration reform is also providing a perfect business environment for those who prey on the undocumented in the Chinatowns, barrios and other immigrant enclaves around the country.