SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (290711)6/17/2006 3:10:22 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575303
 
Ted, No, what's getting very old is "bring 'em on".

Words are words, but our very existence in Iraq is saying "Bring it on." Nothing new about that.


Even after Bush regrets using those words, you still don't get why? Words are more than words; they convey attitude. "Bring 'em on" suggests a superiority and an arrogance that is offensive. It would have been bad enough had he said it simply to Americans but he said it to the world.

I'm just getting tired of those who think my opinion shouldn't matter because I don't have a kid in Iraq.

That may be part of the message they are trying to convey but the more important part of the message is that you might not think the way you do now if you had kids fighting over in Iraq.

Like I said before, most people who served in the military support Bush when it comes to Iraq. All the left wants to focus on are the Cindy Sheehans and the Michael Bergs of this nation.

We have enough anecdotal evidence to suggest that not more than half the military supports the war in Iraq. And I suspect that's even less true of their parents. Too often, the guys fighting over in Iraq have been snookered into believing that the Iraqi war is the frontline of the war on terror and its better to fight them over there than here. Given who they are, they are more susceptible to the proganda than the general population.