Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (23839)	6/12/2006 1:10:57 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

<I don’t see it as radical or particularly new, except that it is being promoted by Hippy Eastern Mystic Physicists> Yes, just new to this thread... Promoted?? I guess that's dependant on your viewpoint. <This theory also pushes a science of moral realism as foundational, with material expression ...> "Moral realism" takes on differing meaning depending on ones overall philosophy or viewpoint... if consciousness is omnipresent "objective moral values" are replaced by an infinite context. <The obvious problem encountered when pursuing such discourse is obtaining agreement in ethical semanticisms.> Right, you'd have to 'realize' consciousness as omnipresence to transcend the need for 'agreement'. <‘So What?’. Yes, but you could have said that when you found out the earth wasn't the center of the universe. Some assume truth is a good thing to find/persue, etc. <What purpose does human consciousness serve, if not to allow human will to liberate self from the grosser endeavors of human existence.> But isn't that happening?? Isn't that 'evolution'? DAK