Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shades who wrote (63466)	6/12/2006 2:42:17 PM
From: grusum	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 110194

yes, i've been looking too. i can't find any evidence that radiation from gold would remain high for many years.. i could have sworn that i read that radioactivity was a problem with the gold made in that way. if anyone can make gold at a profit though, someone will. but no one can do it right now. and the cost of energy should decline after we switch to non-oil and gas energy production, years in the future. maybe then sometime gold can be 'made'. (i can't believe i just typed that.) at any rate, i won't worry about it for quite some time. there might be other problems with changing lead into gold also. i have never seriously looked into it. sometime i will.