Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (54472)	6/12/2006 10:58:32 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313075

What about WTC 7? It wasn't hit by a plane.

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (54472)	6/12/2006 11:04:32 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313075

This is a lecture.....better than reading the report because it gives a better idea of who the writers are. What about the THIRD TOWER? What brought it down SEVEN HOURS LATER? It wasn't hit by an an airplane and having the TWO larger towers collapse is mathematically impossible, plus they did not tip but rather they fell on their own footprint. The firefighters also said there were explosions. SO....this is truth to me because the engineers have no financial motives. what are those plumes coming out from the bldg? No one can prove that the planes brought the 2 big bldgs down but there are experts that prove it wasn't them alone.

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (54472)	6/12/2006 11:11:01 PM
From: russet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313075

You're wasting your time,...you're responding to black helicopter/alien abduction folks. Devils are hiding behind every corner :-)