SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (742469)6/13/2006 6:37:03 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Re: "I would point out to you that the HILTON FORTUNE was accumulated and passed on while the Inheritance tax ranged as high as 70 PERCENT. Yet, theirs is intact."

Sounds like you are abandoning the argument that am ultra high estate tax rate will 'wipe out' the ultra rich....

"The people that get hurt are the SLIGHTLY RICH who have enough to be comfortable but not enough to set up and administer the various trusts necessary to escape the tax."

Sounds like an excellent reason to have a high 'floor' under the estate tax --- say $5 million or $10 million or $15 million or so... an amount that's automatically raised thereafter with CPI adjustments --- so the 'slightly rich' (as you phrase it) are not inconvenienced.



To: JDN who wrote (742469)6/14/2006 5:07:09 PM
From: RMF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Well...then don't you think it would be better to make adjustments in the tax itself to shield the "semi-wealthy" from an undue burden rather than just tossing the whole thing out?

The estate tax provides a LOT of revenue. I know in a perfect world we would have NO taxes and we wouldn't have to worry about deficits and infrastructure and two simultaneous wars, but in the REAL world that stuff comes up.