Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (189186)	6/14/2006 1:58:16 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

But there is no need for baseless speculation to conclude that Rove was involved in the leak and that the White House misled the public about his participation and broke a pledge to fire anyone who had leaked information about Valerie Wilson, the CIA officer married to former ambassador Joseph Wilson, a critic of the administration. Bush actually promised to fire anybody who had broken a law. After this long, long, long examination that has come up empty - not even a perjury charge, something that can be brought basically at the prosecutor's discretion - I think those who are not married to the idea that Rove must be criminal will acknowledge that Rove did not break the law. Aside from the fact that Plame's covert status is doubtful and seems to have been on paper only, a leftover from years previous, half of Georgetown already knew she was CIA, because hubby Joe, he got a big mouth. It's hard to divulge information when everybody you're talking to knows it already.