SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (77102)6/14/2006 9:19:22 AM
From: ChinuSFORespond to of 81568
 
COMMENT
Baghdad's unwelcome visitor
By Ehsan Ahrari

There are numerous explanations for President George W Bush's surprise trip to Iraq - such a surprise that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki didn't know about it until five minutes before they met.

It could be part of electioneering - an attempt to push upward Bush's standing in the opinion polls; a bid to secure the re-election of Republican legislators worried that the public anger stemming from the war in Iraq will throw them out of office come November; or it could be Bush's endeavor to maintain the momentum stemming from Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's death.

It is probably a combination of all of the above, but for the Iraqi prime minister, just beginning the arduous task of establishing legitimacy for his national-unity government, Bush's trip is not likely to help at all.

During the European colonial era, political upheavals in a colony affected the colonizing power's domestic politics. Consequently, the leader of the colonial power maneuvered to improve his domestic standing or improve his chances of staying in power by influencing the domestic politics of that colony. That is what one was reminded of when watching Bush hop on to Air Force One for the five-and-a-half-hour visit.

His proffered reason was that he wanted to look Maliki in the eyes and assure him that the United States stood with Iraq. One wonders why Maliki would want to be seen in the company of Bush at a time when he is desperately trying to build his own legitimacy. Bush, after all, is as popular as the plague in Iraq.

In this technological age, Bush could just as easily have stage-managed a video-conference session with his and Maliki's cabinets at which the Iraqis could have outlined what it was they needed and wanted from the US. From a public relations angle, it could have been highly beneficial.

Instead, the US president went to Iraq. He spoke of liberty in a country where even he himself did not have the liberty to take a sneak peak at the Iraqis struggling to stay alive.

Bush's trip to Iraq - his first since 2003 - was a well-kept secret. Only Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld knew of the surprise.

He landed at Baghdad's airport and then took a helicopter to the Green Zone. If one is looking for any difference between his last trip and this visit, there certainly was one. During the previous jaunt, Bush stayed at the airport. This time, he flew to the highly fortified Green Zone. Hardly progress.

For Iraqis, Bush's trip must have been a matter of fleeting curiosity. They would have seen the image of the US president with their newly elected premier and wondered what it was all about.

Bush met with Maliki's entire cabinet, while his own cabinet was back in Washington. This was another symbolism fully aimed at capturing the attention of the US public, that he is doing something in and about Iraq.

During his meeting with Bush, Maliki announced an intense security sweep in Baghdad, where he wants to begin establishing the legitimacy of his government. Even though such attempts in the past have not borne much fruit, well-wishers hope that this time things will be different.

As Bush was meeting with elected officials and with his own troops, the insurgents issued a press release, aimed similarly at boosting the morale of their jihadis. Abu Hamza al-Muhajir was named as the successor to Zarqawi, killed in a US air strike last week.

The insurgents declared, "Coming battles will reveal the falseness of your power and the cowardliness of your soldiers. Do not rejoice that you killed [Zarqawi], he has left behind lions that ... trained under him.

"You will see what we have in store for you because of your betrayal and apostasy. Our swords are poised above your necks," the statement said of Iraqis who cooperate with US-led forces.

The US promptly announced that Muhajir would be placed on the terrorist list and would be hunted down and eliminated.

It seems that already the next installment of terror and counter-terror is being written, with a few changes in the cast of characters. Maliki wants to establish a momentum about creating the legitimacy of his government. So does Muhajir, except he wants to recapture the momentum that his side lost with the death of Zarqawi. Bush is doing his best to maintain the momentum that his forces gained by killing Zarqawi. It is hard to believe that even in death, Zarqawi maintains such a powerful presence.

Bush appears to be a man eagerly looking for a magic potion for the solution of the Iraqi malady, where death and destruction rule. Bush created the Iraqi tragedy by invading the country, and is trying desperately to get out with his head held high.

Maliki, on the other hand, is a man on whose shoulders fate has dumped the awesome responsibility of governing Iraq, a task that will take resolve and vision.

Muhajir remains a dark shadow. Yet he might be the only actor who has the upper hand over Bush and Maliki. The US president knows that. That might be why he is trying all sorts of maneuvers to figure what will work for him.

atimes.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (77102)6/14/2006 9:56:28 AM
From: ChinuSFORespond to of 81568
 
Poll: U.S. in Iraq Clouds Mideast Stability

By WILL LESTER
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The presence of U.S. troops in Iraq is a greater threat to Mideast stability than the government in Iran, according to a poll of European and Muslim countries.

People in Britain, France, Germany, Spain and Russia rated America's continuing involvement in Iraq a worse problem than Iran and its nuclear ambitions, according to polling by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. Views of U.S. troops in Iraq were even more negative in countries like Indonesia, Egypt, Jordan, Turkey and Pakistan.

America's image rebounded in some countries last year after the U.S. offered aid to tsunami victims, but those gains have disappeared, the Pew poll found.

For example, 52 percent of Russians had a favorable view of the U.S. in 2005, but that slipped to 43 percent in 2006. In India, 71 percent had a favorable view and that slipped to 56 percent this year. In Spain, the favorable rating slipped from 41 percent last year to 23 percent this year.

In Indonesia, the percentage with a favorable view of the U.S. dropped from 38 percent to 30 percent this year. Fewer than a third of the people in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan and Turkey had a favorable view of the U.S.

Iraq is one of many issues that pushes a negative view of the U.S., said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center.

"Last year we saw some good news in countries like Russia and India," Kohut said. "That good news being wiped away is a measure of how difficult a problem this is for the United States.

"Western countries share some points of view," Kohut said, noting mutual concerns about Iran's development of a nuclear program and the victory of Hamas in Palestinian elections. "But Iraq continues to be divisive."

Iran's nuclear program is seen as a serious threat by international leaders, who have been pressuring Iran to drop that program. Leaders of the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany have offered Iran, which says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, incentives to suspend uranium enrichment.

But the war in Iraq trumps the Iranian situation as a perceived danger to the world at a time when the image of the United States and its war on terrorism continues to drop internationally.

The 15-nation poll also found:

-Overall support for the U.S.-led war on terrorism has declined even among close allies. Support for the war on terror has dropped in Britain from 63 percent in 2004 to 49 percent now.

-Favorable opinions of the United States continue to fall, with sharp declines in Spain, Turkey and India.

-People in the United States and European countries are far more likely than those in Muslim countries to view the victory of Hamas in the Palestinian elections as a negative development.

-Western European nations and predominantly Muslim nations have sharply different views on Iran, which the U.S. claims is developing nuclear weapons.

-Majorities in 10 of 14 foreign countries - including Britain - say the Iraq war has made the world more dangerous.

-Concern about global warming is low in China and United States, the two largest producers of greenhouse gases, while high elsewhere.

The polling in 15 countries of samples ranging from about 900 to 2,000 adults was conducted in April and May and has a margin of error ranging from 2 to 6 percentage points. The polling included Muslim oversamples in the European countries. In China, India and Pakistan, the polling was based on urban samples.

The nations in which polling was conducted were China, Egypt, France, Germany, Great Britain, India, Indonesia, Japan, Jordan, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia, Spain, Turkey and the United States.

hosted.ap.org