Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JeffA who wrote (68765)	6/13/2006 7:07:06 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Rove is very guilty and you know it. A statement from his attorney does not any way change the fact Rove blabbed a covert CIA agent's name to reporters with malicious intent, then lied about it to investigators. Those are the fact we know about. Admittedly, we don't know much more. That includes you guys on the rightwing. All you know is Rove's attorney say no indictment, a reporter said yes he's indicted and Fitzgerald is 100% mum. You also know Rove leakeed Plame's name and lied about it. If this attorney is lying, it would not be the first time. Or the reporter could be wrong. Or they could both be right if Fitzgerald changed his mind. And why would he change his mind? Maybe if Rove flipped and agreed to testify against other crooks in the White House, especially Dick Cheney whose idea this Plame-outing seems to have been in the first place. Notice Cheney's righthand man is indicted already and has stated he was ordered to leak the name by "superiors". That means Cheney. Could also mean Rove, but probably cheney.