SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (21007)6/14/2006 4:46:17 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 541299
 
You're right. Think I'll call WHO and ax them to make the number 145, 731.
Then doubling will be 291,462, more or less, cuz I did it in my head. Very pretty numbers.



To: Lane3 who wrote (21007)6/14/2006 4:49:37 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541299
 
Neither Hansen nor Nature is the source for those numbers. WR's reference to Hansen had to do with a different question. Nature was one publication that reported the WHO's study. WHO is the source. That it was published in Nature is incidental.

Perhaps we are talking past one another. One of the links in the WR post I read, went to the text of a 60 minutes interview with James Hansen of NASA. I was referring to that.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News