SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (77125)6/14/2006 6:09:39 PM
From: Nadine CarrollRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
There is all this talk about not cutting and running. But I think the propagandists for Bush are making it look like the opponents of the war suggesting that. I would no surely not. Do you think Bush should start working towards building a coalition to rebuild Iraq?


Please say again, I don't quite get what you are asking here.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (77125)6/15/2006 9:28:14 AM
From: RichnorthRespond to of 81568
 
Keeping Iraq's Oil In the Ground

By Greg Palast, AlterNet. Posted June 14, 2006.

Did the U.S. invade Iraq to tap its oil reserves or to make sure they stayed under the sand?

World oil production today stands at more than twice the 15-billion a-year maximum projected by Shell Oil in 1956 -- and reserves are climbing at a faster clip yet. That leaves the question, Why this war?

Read on:

alternet.org