SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jon Koplik who wrote (7377)6/15/2006 10:10:54 AM
From: macavity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
multi-year? you dont think so?

20/25 years is a bit long for multi-year.
Even I know that Gold was around 800+ in the early 80s.

I did not say all-time highs.



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (7377)6/18/2006 11:00:03 PM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 33421
 
YUAN UNDER 8.00-- China moves to fend off economic overheating

(So the Yuan should be off to the races on a quick 12-15% appreciation over the next 6-8 weeks)....JJP

------------------

China moves to fend off economic overheating

Friday, June 16, 2006 10:19:00 AM (GMT-06:00)
Provided by: Reuters News
(Adds refererence to China's foreign direct investment)

By Kevin Yao and Eadie Chen

BEIJING, June 16 (Reuters) - China on Friday moved to curb the rapid credit growth that its leaders fear could cause the red-hot economy to overheat, as the central bank imposed new limits on the amount of money commercial banks can lend.

It raised the proportion of money banks must keep in their reserves by half a percentage point, effective July 5.

The move follows a 27 basis-point hike in benchmark lending rates in late April and a revaluation of the yuan by .1 percent against the dollar in July last year.

It came just days after China's State Council, or cabinet, called for moves to cool the economy, whose main problems it listed as "excessive growth in fixed asset investment, runaway credit growth and especially structural imbalances".

Some analysts said the central bank move could be effective in curbing the destabilising credit boom.

Ben Simpfendorfer, a Hong Kong-based strategist for Royal Bank of Scotland, said it raised the costs for banks seeking funds, which they would have to pass on to borrowers.

"All they are doing is hiking the administered rate at which banks could lend but they're not affecting or tightening the base cost of funding itself," Simpfendorfer said.

"This will have far more impact than the late April rate rise," he said.

The last time the central bank raised reserve requirements for banks, in April 2004, it led to a surprising tightening of liquidity and higher money market rates, he said.

But Hong Liang with Goldman Sachs in Hong Kong said the effectiveness of such an adjustment would likely be eroded quickly by continued inflows of foreign exchange, driven by the undervalued currency.

"The excess reserve ratio stood at 3 percent at the end of March, and therefore, the 50 basis-point increase is not binding on the banks' capability to lend," she said.

For now, the central bank was likely to rely on tools such as open market operations and the issuance of special bills to help mop up excess liquidity, but could allow the yuan to appreciate more rapidly as the year went on, analysts said.

The yuan <CNY=CFXS> hit 7.9970 to the dollar on Friday, its highest level since last July's revaluation. Further appreciation could dampen exports and make monetary policy easier to manage.


'TOO FAST'

"Money supply and credit growth are too fast. And also the trade surplus is widening. The increase in bank reserve requirements by 0.5 percentage point is aimed at curbing this rapid growth," the central bank said in announcing the move on its Web site (www.pbc.gov.cn).

The bank reserve requirement before the move was 7.5 percent for big state banks and joint-stock banks and 8 percent for smaller banks, including urban credit cooperatives. Rural cooperative banks and credit cooperatives were exempted from the increase.

The central bank the move would tie up an additional 150 billion yuan, and would help fend off inflation, which might rebound if money supply were not kept in check.

China attracted $60.33 billion in foreign direct investment last year, some three times the roughly $19 billion that the tighter reserve requirements will extract from the system.

The bank said it would continue to carry out open-market operations on an appropriate scale to keep liquidity growth at a reasonable level.

Economists had expected the bank to raise reserve requirements or interest rates, given strong economic data in recent months that have shown investment and credit accelerating, but not so quickly.

"Most economists expected further tightening measures to come from the beginning of the third quarter but I think the decision is right and this is better," said Cheng Manjiang, China economist with Bank of China International in Beijing.

($1=7.997 Yuan)

(Additional reporting by Tamora Vidaillet and Jason Subler)

((Editing by Gerrard Raven; Reuters Messaging: brian.rhoads.reuters.com@reuters.net; +86 10 6598-1206))

Keywords: ECONOMY CHINA REQUIREMENT





To: Jon Koplik who wrote (7377)9/21/2006 1:52:26 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33421
 
WSJ -- Some Investors Lose Their Zest for Commodities ..............................................

September 21, 2006

Some Investors Lose Their Zest for Commodities

Natural-Gas Debacle at Amaranth May Signal Broad Price Declines; 'Most Were
Just Speculators'

By GREGORY ZUCKERMAN and HENNY SENDER

On the heels of natural-gas losses at Amaranth Advisors and other hedge funds and
a tumble in numerous commodities, some investors are selling such holdings in a
shift that could send prices lower if it turns into a rush for the exits.

After long shying away from oil, natural gas, metals and other raw materials, investors
of all stripes -- hedge funds, pension plans, endowments and individual investors
-- have become enamored with commodity investing. These investors, including short-term
speculators, have become key in various markets, sometimes driving prices more than
industrial customers who buy the materials to make things or sell services.

How these Johnny-come-lately investors react now "will have an effect on users,
commercial producers, as well as investors," says Howard Simons, a strategist
at Chicago-based Bianco Research. "The flood of money that's come in is
out of scale to anything in the past, and most were just speculators."

There are 68 commodity-oriented hedge funds, up from 29 just three years ago, according
to Hedge Fund Research Inc. Those figures don't include the growing number of
managed-futures funds and so-called multistrategy hedge funds, like Amaranth, that
also deal in commodities.

As for pension funds, "until 2003, there wasn't a whole heck of a lot of
interest in commodities," says Neil Rue, principal at Pension Consulting Alliance
Inc. in Los Angeles. "But commodities are becoming a major asset class and
investments in the area have multiplied since 2003. It wasn't 10% or 5% a year,
but much more than that." Mr. Rue cautioned pension-plan clients to be wary
of commodities.

Much as they did with tech-oriented investments shortly before they tanked in 2000,
individual investors also have rushed into commodities, via stocks of commodity-related
companies and mutual funds that specialize in such investments. There are 48 mutual
funds that invest in commodities and related shares managing $56 billion, up from
34 funds with less than $10 billion three years ago, according to fund tracker Morningstar
Inc. The Commodity Real Return fund of Allianz AG's Pacific Investment Management
Co. has grown to more than $12.2 billion, from $8 billion about a year ago.

The 13th-largest holder of gold in the world isn't a central bank but an exchange-traded
fund, a type of security that trades like a stock and tracks the price of an underlying
investment class. StreetracksGold Trust, the largest gold ETF, has assets of $7.5
billion, up from $2.7 billion a year ago, mostly from new investments.

For evidence of these investors' influence, consider the Goldman Sachs commodity
index, one of the most popular vehicles for betting on raw materials. In July, Goldman
Sachs tweaked the index's content by cutting its exposure to gasoline. Investors
tracking the index had to adjust their portfolios accordingly -- which sent gasoline
futures prices tumbling.

Some investors entered these markets because they saw a long-term undersupply of
a range of commodities, including oil, as economic growth in China and India increased
demand. But others were less interested in such fundamentals and shifted in simply
because commodities prices had gone up in recent years, hoping to catch the next
wave. Low interest rates made it possible for hedge funds to borrow at attractive
rates and invest in almost anything.

Lead illustrates the impact: It's basically industrial waste, the unloved byproduct
of processing copper and gold. But prices for lead -- mostly used in batteries,
primarily for vehicles -- have more than doubled in the past five years, even though
stockpiles are high.

Now there are signs that some of that "hot" money is exiting the market.

"Large speculators began to liquidate gold and silver," wrote Mary Ann
Bartels, a Merrill Lynch analyst, in a report this week. "But there are no
signs of panic that accompany a bottom."

The gold ETF has seen little new money in the past month. "The luster is off
this sector, people are suddenly realizing that gold-fund returns will not be as
good as they've been," says Jeff Tjornehoj, an analyst at mutual fund tracker
Lipper.

Merrill Lynch's research suggests that hedge funds that speculate in oil have
been doing some selling lately, but many actually added to their natural-gas positions
while keeping their heating-oil positions unchanged. Oil futures dipped below $60
a barrel during yesterday's trading session and closed at $60.46, down $1.20.

The Pimco commodity fund is seeing little new investments lately, in part because
it's down almost 7% this year, though it also hasn't seen much in the way
of withdrawals, says portfolio manager John Brynjolfsson, calling fund flows "relatively
steady and uneventful."

A fall in commodities prices might not be all bad news. Though a rush for the exits
could cause pain for commodities investors, an additional decline in the cost of
energy and industrial metals could give a shot in the arm to the global economy.
And money moved out of commodities could shift into the stock market, sending shares
higher.

The end of this month could be key. Many commodity-oriented hedge funds let investors
withdraw money monthly or quarterly, so if losses persist, there may be big withdrawals.
That could cause more carnage in the hedge-fund world.

Amaranth's woes were caused by bad bets that natural-gas prices would rebound.
Yesterday, natural-gas futures continued reacting to a large selloff of positions
by Amaranth. October natural-gas futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange dropped
7.5 cents to settle at $4.93 per million British thermal units. November gas futures
settled 18 cents down at $6.02/MMBtu, December futures dropped 22.1 cents to $7.66/MMBtu
and January fell 23.6 cents to $8.20/MMBtu.

Write to Gregory Zuckerman at gregory.zuckerman@wsj.com and Henny Sender at henny.sender@wsj.com

Copyright © 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.