SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (170079)6/15/2006 8:10:59 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793928
 
We've had the seat belt debate 100 times.



To: kumar who wrote (170079)6/16/2006 10:27:44 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793928
 
would you have the same opinion for mandatory seatbelts in a car

If by mandatory seatbelts you mean mandatory wearing them, yes. It is paternalism - the only person you are hurting is yourself.

I only started wearing my seatbelt in the last four years or so. As my driving got better (less reckless, that is), I started wearing it, go figure. :)

Derek


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News