Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Election Fraud Reports -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (749)	6/15/2006 10:11:13 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Respond to of 1729

Based on the statistics and probabilities AS has a good case for arguing that it's been proved. I'm not sure how a court of law looks at statistics and probabilities. They probably do it all the time. Heck a breathalizer machine is based on probabilities and statistics to determine blood alcohol. One of those was good enough to convict W of a DUI. Perhaps a statistical analysis of the votes would be enough to prove fraud...I don't know. Perhaps we can agree that at the very least a full investigation of the Ohio election is mandated? Then let the cards fall where they may. It's a little like closing the barn door after the horse is gone IMHO. I think the proper way of removing W is though impeachment. Best, Orca