Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (23919)	6/16/2006 3:10:47 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

<There is no evidence of a unified field,> But the convesation went that you said "if there was a unified field why couldn't there be a gatekeeper"... I simply said I didn't think it made sense: Message 22549960 Seems plausible to me to just drop it now, we differ on these things... besides I think "proof" is a better word than "evidence"... Since "unified field" really has no definition, it is more of a concept as far as I can tell there seems to be all sorts of people including the elite in the field of physics that would disagree with your use of 'evidence': homepage.ntlworld.com beotel.yu allanstime.com e-kr.org lrz-muenchen.de supersymmetry.com In fact there is incredible things all over the internet for something that there is no evidence for!!! LOL, I like the last one. DAK