To: creede who wrote (426 ) 6/17/2006 1:29:05 AM From: creede Read Replies (1) | Respond to Guys. After reading that...I could see that I needed to send her a message. She was basically challenging us to find something better than PLNI. Here's my e-mail to her!Message 22549690 ). Your analysis was top notch, and I agree 100%. Probably the only thing that you overlooked was the amount of dilution that the PLNI investors incurred. The count is in the billions, but I didn't write you to talk about PLNI. I wrote you to point out the one best stock in all the pinksheet market. I know what you are thinking....there is no such thing! lol No really. I read several of the Garner's books back a few years ago, and decided to apply their zeal for the small caps into the micros.....and..(it's hard to say)....the nano's! Ever notice that everyone calls a nano a micro? I guess they are just too embarrassed! Anyway, I have worked out a system to try to find the one or two flamingo's (term of endearment for a pinksheet stock) that may be different from the rest. Subject 56210 investorshub.com investorshub.com ) to the Sanctuary ( investorshub.com ). Now, no stock and no guru has made it to the sanctuary yet. But, that takes me back to the reason I wrote you in the first place. Remember writing this?"That should be enough to douse any enthusiasm about this company. Will it become a great success one day? Well, who knows? But it sure doesn't seem to be offering a great track record to which you can entrust your hard-earned dollars. This isn't even a highly unusual penny stock, I'll bet. In fact, I invite my readers to point me to any other penny stocks that they think might hold some interest, for future articles." investorshub.com Read all the stuff in the board box. There is also a link to the filings. Last, but not least, call Dexter and ask a few questions. IMVHO, this stock will not be a flamingo for long....or a nano either for that matter!
