SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : BABOONS of BAN! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (121)6/19/2006 8:36:00 AM
From: lorne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186
 
Solon.....""I don't wish to slander somebody. Especially, I don't think it is fair to accuse people behind their backs. I don't know Solon. Your reference to him is obviously self serving and personal as it does not make any point relevant to our discussion. Please try not to make gratuitous attacks against posters not here to defend their integrity."".....

...."Especially, I don't think it is fair to accuse people behind their backs. I don't know Solon."....

I have already taken care of this point some time ago.

....."I don't know Solon. Your reference to him is I don't know Solon.and personal as it does not make any point relevant to our discussion".....

....I don't know Solon.....

This point was pointed out as well to other poster.

.....Your reference to him is obviously self serving....

I did not know this to be true of the other poster and had no reason to suspect otherwise.

......it does not make any point relevant to our discussion......

Ane here IMO is the main point that you are missing... YES, It was relevant to the discussion I was having with the other poster.... The other poster was arguing that Canada and Canadians in general were negligent in defence of the American side of the border and I was defending My point of view that Canada and Canadians were doing their part. The other poster in my view seemed to have a strong dislike on for Canada and Canadians in general and we got things cleared up. It was at this point that he made the statement about anti American Canadians and he named two in particular that bothered him and I agreed that I to/too/two :-) am fed up with anti American Canadians...not necessarily the two posters mentioned but the notion of anti America Canadians. I had no reason to question the other poster's actually naming anyone as it didn't matter to me as I was agreeing with the overall notion.

Now I will mention again to you your posts about other posters that could be IMO ...."obviously self serving and personal Should I assume that you are correct in your description of these posters...should anyone who reads your words just automatically assume you are correct ?

I agreed with the notion of anti American Canadians being wrong, Not anyone personally. You it appears posted outright slander of other posters and I doubt that anyone questioned your motives for posting in this manner... except for what came up in our discussions here.

How many times have you seen on SI slanderous remarks made by one poster about another? and how many times did you question the accuracy of the statements??

And I do understand why you think I slandered you I just believe and know what my intentions and thoughts were at that time.

Do you feel the need to apologise to me for all the name calling? not likely and I don't really care. This is a open public forum and lots of strange things are said.