Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (9473)	6/19/2006 2:18:44 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

I have posted on numerous occasions: "That government which governs least governs best." "you got your DREAM government, with the Repubs in charge of both houses and the whitehouse." Given their track record, how can you make that claim when it contradicts my publicly stated ideals? If Democrats were not bent o the destruction of our Republic themselves and the President, I would prefer a divided government. Getting legislation passed in a divided government is generally harder. The fewer laws passed the less harm government can do. "I suppose it's all the FMSM (whatever that is) that's caused evrything....right????" Read the subject header for the answer to your question. And yes the FMSM does a great disservice to the country with their partisanship. "You GOT your guy right there with the VETO pen. " No, we avoided the guy with the three purple owies after we avoided the socialist guy who is politically simpatico with the author of Hillary SCare. President Bush 43 is a lightweight who has never wielded his veto pen. Will the true conservatives who want to conserve please stand up!