Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77333)	6/21/2006 1:55:44 AM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 81568

Saddam had no WMD since 1992. Or if he had any it was very minimal, old mustard gas shells maybe. Kid's stuff. By 1998 he had nothing and the White House knew it. He also had absolutely nothing to do with Al Qaida or active terrorists. This has been proven by top level CIA analysts who have retired so they can speak freely. Bushies lied about everything. Halliburton and Cheney's crook Chalabi now run the Iraqi oilfields. Maybe stealing that oil was their #1 plan. Who knows? Whatever it is, it's major league criminality.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77333)	6/21/2006 8:25:38 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Respond to of 81568

(I just heard this again tonight on FrontLine on PBS). If you did, then you would not be in denial and wasting your time on this issue. The show shed light on what a crook Cheney (the mushroom cloud man) has been. Now, raise your hand if you really think the leopard changed its spots, and Saddam had given up all ambitions in that direction. BUsh and Cheney didn't know his arse from his head. He botched up the 9 months he was in office and caused Al-Qaeda to strike massively within our shores on 9/11. And you say these two men were capable to actively gather and analyze intelligence to conclude that Saddam had WMDs. By the way, you seem confused and confused totally. In your past posts you have indicated that Saddam had WMDs. Then you say that Saddam was trying to procure nuclear weapons. Which one is it? Either way, we did not find any evidence, did we?