Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (8516)	6/21/2006 11:38:34 AM
From: DMaA	Respond to of 14758

Anyone who owns SF city bonds had best dump them quick. SF will declare bankruptcy 1 month after implementing this thing,

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (8516)	6/21/2006 12:49:47 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 14758

Prescription drugs? Ummm, something tells me the city's elderly, transplant and gay populations are about to take a giant leap.

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (8516)	6/22/2006 8:45:38 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

Residents would pay both monthly fees and service co-payments on a sliding scale depending on income. A person with annual earnings at the federal poverty line would pay $3 per month, while someone who makes between $19,600 and $40,000 - or up to 400 percent above the poverty line - would pay an average of $35 per month. Considering the vast number of AIDS cases in San Francisco sounds to me as though either the taxpayers are going to take it on the chin big time or the plan will go bust shortly. jdn