SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (189933)6/22/2006 11:49:02 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
would this bring peace?

Maybe. I'm not sure if the Pals would take it as the end point. And Jerusalem was a divided city in '67. It isn't splitable at this point, so it would have to be an open city., or Israeli, with total access by the Pals. Don't know if anybody would accept that. And, I guess after that, it depends how many "Drive them into the sea" types there are out there, and how they would respond.

Is Labor for it? I dunno; my interest in their politics is pretty much confined to Labor good, Likud bad, and too many small parties are bad.
"When you open a can of worms, you'll find it takes a bigger can to put them all back"



To: michael97123 who wrote (189933)6/25/2006 3:25:02 AM
From: Elroy  Respond to of 281500
 
If the israelis went back to 67 borders and removed all the settlers, would this bring peace?

I doubt it would bring long term peace. What do you think?

Oh never mind, you both answer in the next posts. Guess I have some catching up to do!



To: michael97123 who wrote (189933)6/25/2006 3:30:02 AM
From: kumar  Respond to of 281500
 
another difficulty is addressing the "right of return" stuff that is part of the negotiations...