Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (14168)	6/22/2006 7:47:28 PM
From: jackjc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78410

My 'under the table its so cheap' is Roxmark, but can't mention it as is just under 15, site rule. Final pieces of the puzzle coming together IMO, should be starting a large moly bulk sample in several weeks.

To: LLCF who wrote (14168)	6/22/2006 9:26:23 PM
From: grusum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78410

i'm invested heavily in this one.. check out the last 40 or so posts: Subject 54047 newmont walked away from the midway project and the stock suffered. after newmont walked away midway found 'spring valley' and they have gotten good results there. one the latest news releases claims there is visible gold in two of the five holes that have yet to be released. barrick recently took a stake in midway, buying shares. the drill seems to point to higher grade gold deeper down, so they are drilling four holes to 3500 ft. they have recently added two more drills for a total of 4, indicating their desire to get into high gear. i've been in this one since january of this year and it feels like the stock is ready to take off soon. i'm not an expert or a geologist like many on these boards are, but this stock is my best bet for a multibagger from here. they have 2 million oz of au already in reserves, so it seems the downside is limited from here. i'm on record now i guess..

To: LLCF who wrote (14168)	6/22/2006 9:49:17 PM
From: Mr. Aloha	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 78410

I would also say Roxmark, if I could mention it here, but since I can't, I'll say MMGG, which is "pound the table cheap" vs. where I think it's going, given its world-class zinc deposit in feasibility study plus potential world-class silver and another potentially huge zinc deposit. I haven't seen any junior that compares in upside potential, especially vs. its cheap market cap. I think being on the bulletin board has kept it so cheap, but that should change in coming months with their application for listing on a senior exchange, allowing institutional investors and others to invest. If I could mention Roxmark, I'd mention their getting off the CNQ on to TSX.V, but I don't want to get in trouble, so I won't... :)

To: LLCF who wrote (14168)	6/22/2006 10:47:54 PM
From: GoldBull no bug here	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78410

well, I've got a 100,000 share bid for one, next to VIA, that starts with the letter S, ends in I, but my bid is for 10 cents.. sO I..can't mention the name. In any case, it will probably try the patience of every investor as they are still kicking rocks and flying planes with those magnometer thingies overhead. I'm scrambling to try and place 500 to 1000 share bets on alot of the great properties that have been dumped by the goldbugs. Gold Bull...no bugs allowed!

To: LLCF who wrote (14168)	6/23/2006 12:01:26 AM
From: maxncompany	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78410

keep an eye out this summer to see how much gold CMM.V (soon to be CMM.TO) proves 43-101 in Peru. Historical estimate of potentially 180 million tons 1-3 grams/ton. Announced today CMM now has essentially 96% of this and 100% of surrounding property, one property of which attracted immediate interest of majors looking to JV. Already has 100k oz./yearly production in Canada, which will be increased by end of 2006, early 2007.