SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Next President 2008 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RMF who wrote (69)6/24/2006 6:09:24 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Respond to of 3215
 
DNC moves closer to changing the presidential primary calendar
By Mark Preston
CNN Political Editor
Friday, June 23, 2006; Posted: 3:23 p.m. EDT (19:23 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Democrats took a step closer Thursday towards altering the party's 2008 presidential candidate vetting process when a Democratic National Committee panel voted overwhelmingly to recommend adding two more states to the early part of the nominating calendar.

The DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee did not choose the states, but decided that a caucus would be held between the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, followed immediately by an additional primary before other states would be allowed to hold presidential primary contests.

In July, the DNC Rules Committee will select the two states to recommend to the full DNC membership, which will vote on the proposal in August at the DNC's summer meeting in Chicago.

The vote all but assures that Iowa and New Hampshire will have to share their privileged status as the first proving grounds for Democratic presidential candidates in 2008.

A Republican rule adopted in 2004 prevents the GOP from changing its primary schedule until the 2012 presidential contest.

Don Fowler of South Carolina, a DNC Rules member and an outspoken critic of the plan, conceded at the outset of the vote that he did not have the support to prevent the proposal from moving forward and chose not to require a lengthy debate on the issue.

But two other DNC Rules members, Mark Brewer of Michigan and Kathy

Sullivan of New Hampshire, expressed opposition to the plan. Brewer argued that, in order to achieve the DNC's goals of infusing more ethnic, economic and regional diversity into the primary process, more states would need to be included early on in the primary process.

"I think we have to have at least three or four (states) to achieve those goals," he said.

Sullivan said she opposed the plan because it would encourage

front-loading of the primary calendar and might violate New Hampshire state law, which requires no other primary or caucus be held seven days before the New Hampshire primary.

John Distaso, the dean of New Hampshire political reporters, writes up a more detailed account of reaction from Granite State officials in today's edition of the New Hampshire Union Leader:

Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Hawaii,

Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, South Carolina and West Virginia are vying for the two early calendar slots. Nebraska, which initially asked to be considered for an early primary position, has withdrawn its application.

Fowler calls for additional DNC neutrality in 2008
A condition the 10 states and District of Columbia must meet in order to be considered for an early caucus/primary position is assurance that state party leaders would remain neutral in the presidential primary process. In a June 12 letter, the DNC asked the prospective contenders if a current rule is already in place governing this, and if not, "indicate the extent to which the prospective state is wiling to implement one."

During yesterday's conference call, Fowler asked how the DNC could impose such a restriction on state party leaders if it did not require all 30 members of the Rules committee to take a similar pledge.

"I just can't imagine you would establish that standard for state parties and not ourselves," Fowler said. "It is just inconsistent to not make any sense."

Fowler argued that since the Rules committee has considerable power within the DNC, a similar restriction would help avoid conflicts or the appearance of a conflict of interest during the presidential selection process. The DNC requires the chairman, officers and staff to remain neutral during the primary, but there is no such restriction on Rules committee members. Expect to hear more about this issue at the Rules committee's next meeting in July.

Edwards fined
Former Sen. John Edwards (D-North Carolina) 2004 presidential campaign was fined $9,500 for violating contribution laws in 2003, the Federal Election Commission announced Thursday. Tab Turner, the donor who solicited four $2,000 contributions from colleagues in Jan. 2003 for Edwards and then reimbursed them with a company credit card, was fined $50,000. Turner, whose law practice Turner and Associates is based in Little Rock, Arkansas, also used the credit card to make an illegal campaign contribution in his own name and to pay for various campaign expenses.

Federal law prohibits donors from making contributions in other peoples' names, and prohibits direct corporate contributions to a federal candidate.

Edwards, who is considering another run for president in 2008, did not contest the FEC's ruling and Edwards' spokeswoman Kim Rubey described the FEC's announcement to CNN's Robert Yoon as "old news."

"All the issues that were raised today had been addressed by the campaign back in 2003," she said, adding that the campaign returned all of the illegal contributions referenced in the FEC complaint
cnn.com



To: RMF who wrote (69)7/12/2006 12:32:06 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Respond to of 3215
 
Democrats need old-time religion

Published July 12, 2006

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Barack Obama's call for Democrats to close the religion gap with Republicans shows a keen grasp of the obvious.

As Obama noted in his much-talked-about speech last month at the Call to Renewal's conference of religious liberals in Washington, the biggest gap in party affiliation among white Americans today is "between those who attend church regularly and those who don't."

Right-wing voices such as Pat Robertson, Rev. Jerry Falwell and Alan Keyes, Obama's GOP opponent in the 2004 U.S. Senate race, will continue to hold sway, Obama said, "if we don't reach out to evangelical Christians and other religious Americans and tell them what we stand for."

Other leading Democrats, such as party chairman Howard Dean, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Rev. Al Sharpton, have called for similar outreach to those evangelicals who are open-minded enough to be reached.

The prospect of evangelicals returning to the Democratic Party is openly ridiculed by conservatives, but in private, it probably worries them as much as Democrats are haunted by the possibility of black voters returning to the party of Abe Lincoln.

During the 2004 presidential race, black voters, particularly black evangelicals, helped give President Bush a winning edge in Ohio and in other states, spurred in part by concerns over gay marriage.

In a similar over-the-top distortion, Keyes declared during his 2004 Senate race that "Christ would not vote for Barack Obama." Obama's refusal to respond made sense under the unwritten political rule: Never interrupt your adversary when he is 40 points behind you in the polls. But Obama says he wishes he had spoken up anyway.

"Because," he said, "when we discuss religion only in the negative sense of where or how it should not be practiced, rather than in the positive sense of what it tells us about our obligations toward one another ... others will fill the vacuum, those with the most insular views of faith, or those who cynically use religion to justify partisan ends."

At the Columbus, Ohio, convention of ACORN, the nation's largest grass-roots community group coalition, Sharpton called on progressives Monday to put bread-and-butter issues such as a minimum-wage increase on ballots to counter the "bedroom issues" such as abortion and gay marriage. That's fine as a strategic move. It's always better to fight on your home-turf issues than on someone else's, and Democrats have high credibility on wage issues.

But, Obama says, Democrats need to address the bedroom concerns too. He's not alone in his viewpoint. The conference at which he spoke is part of a national conversation that liberals and progressives are holding to bridge the religion gap. It's about time.
chicagotribune.com