SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito who wrote (77536)6/23/2006 3:23:00 PM
From: sea_biscuitRespond to of 81568
 
I read recently that the Regressives succeeded in preventing the screening of a documentary on under-sea volcanoes because it talked about evolution!



To: Cogito who wrote (77536)6/23/2006 4:00:37 PM
From: Nadine CarrollRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
The Bush Administration would have us believe that there's a tremendous amount of scientific disagreement about this.

What's "this"? That there is warming, or that temperatures are going to shoot up and cause major problems? There is little disagreement on the first, but quite a bit on the second. The models do not agree. The systems at work are non-linear and complex. Nothing I have seen makes me think that science has a handle yet on the mechanisms at work. That being the case, I don't want to waste energy pushing some policy that is likely to be both costly and ineffective.