Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (9645)	6/26/2006 12:30:39 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

I view blanket amnesty for criminal trespassers as an admission of our failure as a nation. Would you support property rights for squatters on your land? Should we support blanket amnesty for murderers who were raised in welfare homes because they were not given a stable environment? Where do we stop once we start compromising our principles? If conservatives approach the immigration debate from a Hispanic phobic angle they will be permitted to become a minority party for the next forty years. If our laws are enforced, both border enforcement and labor laws, many of the illegal immigrants will find it economically beneficial to leave the country. we need the immigrants. What we need is to allow Americans to choose who immigrates. Now Mexicans of honor are not immigrating, only those most willing to break the laws are here. This has to stop. I am for massively increasing immigration quotas, and enforcing our laws.