Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lance Jepsen who wrote (5045)	6/27/2006 10:44:16 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 12518

Talk about straining out a knat[sic] and yet swallowing a camel. How does that relate to PLNI?

To: Lance Jepsen who wrote (5045)	6/27/2006 10:48:51 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 12518

Lance, where is your disclosure statement on your web site? Also, on May 8th, with PLNI trading in the mid 40s, when you wrote "With PLNI falling over the last several weeks, now is an excellent time to double down", did you indeed double down? TIA. - Jeff traderflash.com

To: Lance Jepsen who wrote (5045)	6/27/2006 11:50:43 AM
From: yardslave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12518

You seem to have anger management issues. Ok Mr. sensitive, let us do some serious de-boning here. You don't conduct an interview or serious discussion like that. This is a stock board. It is were people post what they think about certain stocks. If you want to be interviewed, try Dan Rather. Why would I even consider spending my valuable time interviewing or having a discussion with someone that not only doesn't introduce themself(sic) properly as a gentleman should, but comes right out throwing insults? OK. Don't. We can't answer that question. The rest of us didn't see any insults. BTW, just out of curiosity, who is it that considers your time valuable. I assure you, it is not us. I'm suppose to take you more seriously because you are not hiding behind an alias, but then you come out of the gate throwing insults? See above, this is a stock board. If you are going to play here, you need to get over the alias thing. That is the way it always has been, is now, and always will be. Many people take us seriously. If you don't wish to, that is your choice. You can scoot along if you want. Why would I help drive traffic to this sequential message forum by taking my time to respond to someone of questionable character? You really are full of yourself aren't you? What traffic are you going to drive. We been doing just fine without you, thank you very much. Oh, by the way, do you think that anyone takes you seriously. I mean really. snicker.... Why would I even consider spending my valuable time interviewing or having a discussion with someone that not only doesn't introduce themself(sic) properly as a gentleman should, but comes right out throwing insults? Try meditation or yoga, maybe that will help find the answers to these questions. <>So I'm suppose to volunteer my time, my effort, to what appears to be nothing but a flaming discussion (insults already before a discussion has even begun), to help drive traffic to this message forum? I don't think so. Does this mean you are going to leave?...YEEEEEEESSSSSSS!!!!! I may or may not devote some of my time to such an activity depending on my schedule, and if a gentleman steps forward showing a little bit of integrity and character. If you have something to say about PLNI. Say it. I repeat, this is a stock board, which means you may get insulted from time to time. If you are a sensitive type don't post. We have no idea who you are, you are not well read, and we don't care. and do me a favor. I don't have the time to argue with you on all this, and I know that is what your intent is. Just post about PLNI, and you will get a response. If you don't like aliases leave.

To: Lance Jepsen who wrote (5045)	6/27/2006 2:51:44 PM
From: Captain James T. Kirk	Respond to of 12518

Lol, who are you? God? If you are going to draw attention to PLNI, then look at ALL the facts. Who cares about the names & aliases here, the issue is PLNI and all its many issues and mysteries. The article was superficial, it did not address the behind the scenes issues of dilution and the various calims made by the company. Come on now, look at the rally today, on low volume, just because the quotes are up on pinky sheets, so what? How does it make it a better company, combat the dilution, return solid growth and profits, etc.

To: Lance Jepsen who wrote (5045)	6/28/2006 3:45:52 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12518

So in otherwords, Lance, when I predicted some 24 hours ago, that you wouldn't actually address company performance and your writing and thereof, then I called it spot on? Would you require a reference link for definition of outstanding shares? Your first objection was about an alias. That issue was solved. Your second objection is that you were "insulted" by these words: >>"...but since you're adamant about not discussing those issues with an alias, then let's get with it; your discussion about it right here."<< However, that statement is not an insult. It is a statement of fact that you won't discuss company performance issues. I mean really, you've proven that much here, yourself in two posts, either to an "alias" (your first objection) or otherwise. If you consider statements of fact to be insults, permit me to suggest that you throw away your modem, and not walk out of the house unless accompanied by a responsible guardian who can counsel you regarding such insulting atrocities. Perhaps borrowing a child of five from the neighbor should suffice. Did you get beat up a lot whilst in school (not counting this summer session, which is still young of course)? Just answer Kirk's question ... (and how do you know that's an alias, anyway? He might really be a person named James Kirk, who served in the military).