SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9718)6/27/2006 2:25:19 PM
From: ThirdEye  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
So who exactly are you second-guessing here?

All three intelligence sources that agreed the weapons were useless?

The inspectors who said there are no weapons?

The reporter who wrote the story?

The paper that printed it?

All of the above?

What secret personal source do you have for information known only to a few select people of a certain political persuasion that overrules all of the above?

Come on. Out with it!!



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9718)6/27/2006 4:14:50 PM
From: rich evans  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
The issue here is not whether the old WMD was military significant between armies but whether it could be used by terrorists in our cities etc. Old WMD is fine for use by terrorists toward civilians.
Rick


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News