SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ild who wrote (64740)6/28/2006 11:25:59 AM
From: ild  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 110194
 
Date: Wed Jun 28 2006 10:58
trotsky (@stock market) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
and, by implication, this also concerns the XAU, which continues to move in perfect tandem: these 'gap & cr*p' opens are often a bearish short term sign. in bull phases you tend to see the opposite action ( gap down at the open, followed by a steady advance ) .
while the sentiment picture continues to look encouraging ( for both stocks in general as well as the gold sector - e.g. the XAU p/c OI ratio is now at 1.32, and yesterday the put/call volume ratio clocked in at 2.35 ) , the market fails to act on it, which i regard as a big negative. it SHOULD rise, but it doesn't. when positive technical backdrop data are ignored by the market it usually doesn't portend anything good.
otoh, longer term, we can probably look forward to the gold sector decoupling, namely as soon as the yield curve steepens - i.e. as soon as the market becomes convinced that the rate hike cycle is over. it's far from convinced right now - so far, every hike is immediately greeted with FF futures raising the probabilities of yet another one coming down the pike. the reality is though that once the curve inverts, the end of the cycle is definitely close - therefore the most likely short term outcome is that gold and gold shares both spend some time in a lower trading range, similar to the summer months of '04 and '05, until the rates picture clears up ( which happily is bound to coincide with the seasonally strong period ) .

Date: Wed Jun 28 2006 09:49
trotsky (Alberich, 7:26) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
as Arthur Silber has correctly remarked, the US mainstream press is extremely servile and tends toward self-censorship. note that many of the supporters of the current regime demand OUTRIGHT censorship on a regular basis. as Silber further states, there can be little doubt that another incident like 9-11 ( something that has become more, not less, likely as a result of the occupation of Iraq ) could easily lead to these demands receiving serious consideration.
as far as the NYT is concerned, its shameful pre-war reporting ( which amounted to incitement ) means it has a lot to atone for. and yet, it still thinks it must ask 'permission' before reporting on yet another crime perpetrated by this revolting administration. we're in the middle of a paranoid Kafka novel.



To: ild who wrote (64740)6/28/2006 12:31:27 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Respond to of 110194
 
Can't argue with him on those points....

In a sense, the free market certainly would do better than some of the solutions Bushco is touting. Corn ethanol (while they maintain a 50 cent tariff)? Drilling in ANWR? Why not just tax imported BTU's by 10-20 bucks/bbl of oil equivalent, cycle that money into reducing the deficit and go with what the market provides from there.