Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (70824)	6/28/2006 2:26:41 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Nope. To me the issues of environmental quality and conservation of energy should be apolitical. I think that most of the American people, regardless of political affiliation, are for cleaner air, cleaner water and saving energy. The Bush administration has no plans for any of the above. In fact they have cut back on environmental protections, and have made a huge investment of American blood and treasure in an attempt to secure mideast oil. I simply note that moves towards reducing greenhouse gasses and pollution, which some say would help against global warming, also have huge benefits to our nation in terms of a better environment and drive us towards renewable energy and energy independence. The goals of the "folks that believe global warming is due to man" are completely congruent with the goals of everyone in America and should be embraced. They can be embraced by all, but not necessarily for the same reasons.