SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Charters who wrote (14664)6/28/2006 8:29:36 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78418
 
Denialist? I love these Global Warming denialists who point at the Medieval Warming Period and say this is just another one of them. Meanwhile, they ignore the chorus of alarms from latter-day scientists about the imminent global catastrophe if we don't do something about it by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.



To: E. Charters who wrote (14664)6/28/2006 10:30:39 PM
From: LoneClone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78418
 
EC, you have just outlined so perfectly the hubris with which we are approaching this problem.

The consequences of our collective decisions have been of such impact that they have modified the natural cycles your post describes so well, cycles of tremendous scale and impact.

To think we can just ride this out, or that we can somehow control or neutralize the multifarious impacts of modifying the composition of the earth's atmosphere, is absurd.

Perhaps the reason the earth and its atmosphere are warming so quickly is the combined effect of sadly predictable human action and mostly unpredictable natural cycles. Or perhaps it would be even worse if we weren't currently in a natural cooling cycle.

What noone can deny is that we have materially changed the composition of the earth's atmosphere, to an extent normally seen only as a consequence of natural disasters of enormous magnitude and enormity. Or that there are more extreme weather events during times of climatic volatility

[Enormous enormity -- I've been waiting for a chance to use this perfectly correct construction. <vbg>]

LC



To: E. Charters who wrote (14664)6/29/2006 3:20:14 AM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78418
 
EC, you figure these PHD atmospheric scientists overlooked that stuff-lol?