Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (292689)	6/29/2006 12:19:14 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1584517

It would have been better to shoot them all instead of wasting our time with them.

To: Elroy who wrote (292689)	6/30/2006 7:57:51 AM
From: Taro	Respond to of 1584517

But its pretty good to know that those 7.5% rotten eggs when released will next be eliminated in Afghanistan. Taro

To: Elroy who wrote (292689)	7/14/2006 2:16:18 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1584517

At least 15 (maybe more) out of 200 have been caught committing terrorist actions. Then you add in those who were not caught committing terrorism after they left, and those that committed terrorism before they where put in Gitmo. That could be several times 15, but lets assume its only double. So 30 out of the 200 are terrorists, and that out of those we released (who we had less reason to think where terrorists). The percentage out of those still at Gitmo is probably much higher. Lets guess that only half of the people at Gitmo are terrorists. That would mean that if you close it and release everyone you release 200 terrorists. Of course it would also mean that 200 non-terrorists where at Gitmo. But "non-terrorists" doesn't mean innocent. A Taliban fighter who fought the Northern Alliance and then Americans isn't necessarily a terrorist, but he is a captured combatant. Tim