Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24128)	6/29/2006 3:54:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"There is a great deal of substance to physics, substance that has been confirmed by experiments and tests which had every chance to fail if the theory was not correct. Evidence coming from physics explains many of the mechanisms and phenomena within the universe; and there in lies the extent and the limits of its usefulness. There is NO physics theory that even attempts to explain the origin of the universe. Your belief that it could is totally lacking in substance or even speculation about such a mechanism. I have provided you with evidence as to why physics can NOT be used to account for the origin of the universe in previous discussions, that evidence being soley based in physical science ... at which point you gathered up your lab cloak robes and huffed off, calling me names on the way out the back door. Doesn't seem like you have given your self a chance to re-think that baseless position (belief).