Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24240)	6/30/2006 7:02:48 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

"I said I , or rather others smarter than I, have proof that the universe had a start." Nonsense. It is a simple belief in your doctrinal messengers, that you blindly follow. You said you have proof and you are using material logic to try to explain it. The logic works up to the point of the big bang. I simply ask the question, where'd the gumball come from and what was the condition prior to the bang. You don't have to know the specifics to logically determine the gumball either came from nothing or it came from something preceding it. If it came from something preceding it, then it wasn't the beginning. If it came from nothing your logic about a beginning needs some work. In either case your argument fails at this point. You refuse to consider that logic because it challenges your illogical belief about the beginning of time. You may as well claim the universe walked out of the Bible. The two beliefs are equally supported by your type of illogic.