Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (14925)	7/1/2006 2:09:22 PM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 78419

Now that you have a new high bandwidth .75 megabyte per second Java enabled computer, you can play with charts like these below in the latest firefox (http://www.firefox.com/) Man that ultra-hs-cable is sumptin', isn't it? bigcharts.marketwatch.com

To: marcos who wrote (14925)	7/1/2006 4:23:07 PM
From: Gib Bogle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78419

Thanks marcos, that's very useful, and quite reassuring. BTW, I knew about the father-mother naming thing (I'm married to a Peruana), but I haven't been following the election closely and have only heard him referred to as Obrador (by ignorant gringos, I guess). Don Coxe doesn't say much about Mexico, but his stuff seems overall worth listening to, here: events.startcast.com

To: marcos who wrote (14925)	7/1/2006 8:10:11 PM
From: LoneClone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

I've been doing some reading on the Mexican election today, and I think the most important point that I came across is that the new president, no matter who he turns out to be, will be even less able to make any kind of drastic changes than Fox was. Ironically, the reason is that for the first time Mexico has a truly functioning democracy. The two main parties are neck and neck, and the third party close enough behind that no one will have a majority in the Mexican legislative body, and none of the presidential candidates will be able to claim moral authority by winning 50% of the vote. None of the three front runners will even come close. So for better AND for worse, you'll have a president elected by just over a third of those who voted, and a deeply divided legislature, not a recipe for beginning any kind of serious reform. Any reform that does get carried out will reflect yet another meaning of the term "liberal" -- consensus built from bargaining between contending coalitions within Mexican political society. PS Do you want to know how to confuse an American ideologue? Tell him that the Dutch government that just resigned was led by a party called the Liberal Conservatives, and ask him to describe their policies... LC