Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (171971)	7/2/2006 1:47:54 AM
From: KLP	Respond to of 793843

Since when should any media blow a program for something they thought the terrorists """"""" assumed"""""" Maybe the NYT has a mole from the terrorists working for them in some capacity. Maybe that's why they had at least the 4 articles that were posted by CB that seem like a set up, when one looks at them from the distance of time.... What would make the NYT ASSUME the terrorists ASSUMED anything of the sort? Unless of course, the NYT wanted to make it clear to them that the 9-11 Commission, the Congress, and yes, even the NYT wanted some commission to oversee financial transactions of terrorists and wantabe terrorists. *terrorists already assumed?* >>>>> But should the press really be called unpatriotic by the administration, and even threatened with prosecution by politicians, for disclosing things the terrorists already assumed? <<<<<