Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24286)	7/2/2006 3:47:14 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Your approach failed. "so it's not going to make sense without a little effort First: The big bang theory makes perfect sense and I am not arguing that it doesn't. I am arguing that in its current state, it doesn't prove what you claimed it proves (an absolute beginning of time). Second: You admit you don't understand it you just believe it because people much smarter than you say you should. Third: What you call fact, is in truth theory. Fourth: Even if the theory could be confirmed as fact, it does not do what you say it does. It does not explain an absolute beginning for time. It attempts to explain the passage of time from a gumball state of the Universe. Fifth: When asked what came before the gumball and where the gumball came from you begin attacking me instead of answering the question, typical of someone who has their beliefs challenged. I offered plausible (theoretical) explanations for the answer (A universe that inflates and collapses repeatedly) but you ignore them. Sixth: Your beliefs are proof of nothing except your devotion.