Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (77838)	7/2/2006 4:38:52 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Respond to of 81568

Don't take the trouble of banning me. I am "banning" myself from this pathetic thread. Adios! When you cool off and resolve to not call others names and express yourself in a dignified way, you are welcome to post. But if you don't, then that is your choics and struggle to be more humanized and civil. Thank you.

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (77838)	7/2/2006 7:48:53 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Never blame the victim of a smear campaign or political tricks, especially when stealth election fraud is involved, such as manipulating voting machines to fix elections. Bush's crime in 2004 was against The American People, not just Kerry or democrats. Always blame the smearer, the A-hole who hires the Karl Rove type to cheat, smear and lie. That is the one to always blame. Kerry knows he should have retaliated faster and harder against Bushie dirty tricks and smears in 2004, but he was trying to stick to the issues which is supposedly what the citizen voters want him to do. He also didn't expect Bushies to put 130 million dollars behind the tidal wave of lies and smears. He only expected a portion of that so he was overwhelmed. Do you realize n ot a single Bush 2004 claim about Kerry was true? Not a single Bush negative ad was even partly accurqate. Not a single smear of the smearvets was remotely true. WHoi could have expected that level of dishonesty when except for the Florida cheating, the 2000 election was realtively smear-free (except for Bushies vs. McCain). Also, if RFK Jr. is right, Bushies stole 357,000 voites from Kerry in Ohio alone. And was there anything Kerry could have done about it before or after the fact to put himself in the White House? If you can think of something, please advise and I will pass it along to Kerry's rightman whom I have an oncgoing correspondance with. McCain was also beaten by Bush in South Carolina by gross dirty tricks and an awful smear campaign. So you you also think McCain is a coward? And what about Gore? He was certainly cheated. I agree it's humiliating to be cheated but the real problem is we have no investigations and legal action against the cehaters because the Republicans control the government and therefore most of the subpoena powers. All that said, Kerry is not afraid to fight again. He sees 2004 as the first round in a long match where his opponent hit him below the belt and got away with it. So bottomline, Kerry knows he is the real legitimate president. So does Gore for that matter.