SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (293092)7/2/2006 11:10:37 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572957
 
>I'm all ears awaiting your North Korea solution...

>Is it wait eight years like your Iran solution?

At this point, I don't think that either country poses an existential threat to us, so the fact that we're in intractable situations with both shouldn't be such a big deal.

We do have the oil issue with Iran, so we have to deal with them, but do you really think that if we just stopped paying attention to Kim Jong Il, he'd really keep threatening us (to whatever extent he legitimately can)?

-Z



To: steve harris who wrote (293092)7/7/2006 3:23:13 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572957
 
I'm all ears awaiting your North Korea solution...

Is it wait eight years like your Iran solution


What has your boy been doing the last 6 years in terms of NK? Not anything of consequence that's for damn sure.

What needs to be done is diplomacy something that is over the head of your boy. So that means nothing will happen with NK. As for coulter's suggestion, she's a crazy lady......why would anyone listen to her? Oh wait, you do. No surprise there.



To: steve harris who wrote (293092)7/8/2006 5:01:22 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572957
 
I'm all ears awaiting your North Korea solution...

Is it wait eight years like your Iran solution?


How many missiles were fired in the ten+ years Carter inked a deal with NK........or did you think they got the missiles last week?

The difference between Clinton and Bush is that Clinton knew what diplomacy means. Clearly, Bush does not.