Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (15012)	7/3/2006 3:12:17 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

there are more than just he who questions computed modeling. for one thing, the models only include 3 of the 14 known variables that control atmospheric co2. gcm's are the only weapon of mass construction of the pro-anthro-warmo crowd. What may be more significant are the carbon 12 to 13 ratios. They point to a hangover from anthro co2. what they don't point to is whether or not the co2 is causing warming, or the co2, admittedly some of which is anthro, is causing the co2 to hang around. I can see why near man's lair, the co2 is more of the carbon burnt kind, high on c12. still does not mean that it causes warming. on the other hand better safe than sorry short circuits all the science. the math of gcms may be an artifact. because numbers cause artifact does not mean nature can adhere to the model. EC<:-}