Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (22740)	7/3/2006 1:48:59 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541337

Are you of the party that argues George handed his legacy over the Cheney, Addington, and Rumsfeld and can't get it back? Not exactly. I think George relied on people in ways that didn't work out very well, for whatever reasons. Mostly about Iraq, and the treatment of terrorists, including Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. I think most of the country is doing just fine, but not Iraq. I think George isn't very thrilled with the people who failed him, but once you get on the back of the tiger, it's hard to get off. I think he's disgusted by Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and all the rest of that horror show, but he's still listening to the people who give him bad advice. And because he's still listening to the people who gave him bad advice, he's now culpable. But Cheney's got all that under his control, for better or worse. Who could replace him? And how?