SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (293136)7/3/2006 3:37:11 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1573214
 
NYT: Bank program not news to terrorists Sun Jul 2, 10:31 PM ET


Published reports that the U.S. was monitoring international banking transactions were not news to the terrorists who were its target because the Bush administration had already "talked openly" about the effort, The New York Times' top editor said Sunday.

In defending his paper's decision to reveal details of the program, Times executive editor Bill Keller told an interviewer on CBS's "Face the Nation" that such operations are important to an informed public.

"I don't think the threshold test of whether you write about how the government is waging the war on terror is whether they've done something that's blatantly illegal or outrageous," Keller said. "I think you probably would like to know what they're doing that's successful as well."

Keller told CBS host Bob Scheiffer that "when lives are clearly at risk," The Times often withholds information from publication.

"But this was a case where clearly the terrorists or the people who finance them know quite well, because the Treasury Department and the White House have talked openly about it, that they monitor international banking transactions. It's not news to the terrorists," he said.

Reports in several newspapers last month that the White House was tracking terrorist-related financial transactions in the international banking system triggered a new storm of criticism, primarily from Republicans, about news disclosures of secret U.S. efforts to pre-empt terrorist plots and activities.

President Bush said the latest revelation was "disgraceful" and did "great harm" to the country. Rep. Peter King (news, bio, voting record), R-N.Y., chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, reiterated his view on CNN's "Late Edition" on Sunday that The Times should be prosecuted under the 1917 Espionage Act for repeatedly revealing classified information.

"The Times can't have it both ways," King said. "They can't on the one hand say there's no harm in releasing this. Everybody knew about it. But on the other hand, we had to put it on Page One because it was so top secret."

Keller, on CBS, said it is the government that "likes to have it both ways. ... They confide in us when they want to advertise the programs that are successful. And then they rebuke us if we write about something they would prefer we didn't write about."

He added that he is only a little surprised by the level of criticism the paper is receiving.

"I mean, it's an election year. Beating up on The New York Times is red meat for the conservative base," Keller said. "But I don't think this is all politics. I think the administration is a little embarrassed. This is the most secretive White House we've had since the Nixon White House."

Columnist William Safire, who writes the weekly "On Language" column for The New York Times Magazine, defended the paper Sunday on NBC's "Meet The Press."

"I don't speak for the Times. I've been in the Times for 30 years disagreeing with Times' editorial policy right down the line. On this one, I think they did the right thing," he said.



To: steve harris who wrote (293136)7/3/2006 3:38:18 PM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573214
 
As soon as the libs take power after next election and Gitmo is vacated, no doubt the rich will join the first new tenant Anne Coulter in there in a jiffy.
Yes, good old camp mentality at work. "Those repugnicans must be protected from themselves".

Taro



To: steve harris who wrote (293136)7/3/2006 3:38:25 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573214
 
re: things were pretty good under the third reich too...

Odd how today, the attacks on the rich resemble the attacks on the Jews back then....


LOL, there's a concentration camp for rich people just down the street.