Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (744482)	7/4/2006 10:10:12 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Israel should blow them all off the face of the map, that's exactly what these maggots want to do to Israel... GZ

To: puborectalis who wrote (744482)	7/4/2006 10:16:55 AM
From: Hope Praytochange	Respond to of 769670

A flood of money then poured in to the Lamont campaign, both from grassroots donors and from big-money backers like George Soros and Barbra Streisand, allowing him to mount a vigorous advertising push. "We think it's outrageous that Lieberman would hold himself above the democratic process with a small 'd,' " Eli Pariser, executive director of the liberal group MoveOn.org, which is backing Mr. Lamont, said in an interview yesterday. His group reported raising $267,000 for Mr. Lamont last week. Democratic antipathy toward Mr. Lieberman is nothing new; his support for both Persian Gulf wars, free trade, and religion in public life has long made him suspect among some liberals, and he has clashed with teachers' unions in his support for limited experiments with school vouchers. Yet with Iraq a dominant issue this summer, Republican leaders could not be happier to see a Democratic incumbent, even a sometime ally of theirs, hoisted on that one issue. Nothing would delight Republicans more than having Lieberman and Lamont candidacies split the Democratic vote this fall and possibly help Republicans cement their control of the Senate — although polls show the Republican candidate for the Connecticut seat, Alan Schlesinger, far behind. nytimes.com

To: puborectalis who wrote (744482)	7/5/2006 12:33:06 AM
From: Hope Praytochange	Respond to of 769670

Michael Martino was killed in action in Iraq last November when his Cobra helicopter was shot down by the enemy. So last month, members of Captain Martino's Camp Pendleton unit dedicated a plaque in his honor in his hometown of San Diego. It was placed under the 43-foot cross that forms the centerpiece of a memorial on Mount Soledad honoring veterans of all wars. That day, more than 300 Marines stood in line for more than three hours to pay their respects to Michael Martino's parents. But today, the Martinos are being forced to plead to President Bush to save the Mount Soledad cross and their son's memorial. Freedom of Religion, or Freedom From Religion? You see, 17 years ago, an atheist charged that the 52-year-old cross was a violation of the so-called wall between church and state. In 1991, a federal judge agreed. For the past 15 years, everyone -- from private groups to the federal government -- has tried to save the cross of Mount Soledad, but each time, an activist judiciary has stood in the way. Last year, a proposition designed to save the cross by transferring ownership from the City of San Diego to the federal government gained the support of 76 percent of voters. But the left-liberal secularists managed to find another judge to declare the referendum itself unconstitutional. Today, time is about to run out for the preservation of the Soledad Cross. A federal judge has ruled that the City of San Diego has until August 1 to remove the cross or face $5,000 a day in fines. All of which should have us asking ourselves this Independence Day: What did Michael Martino give his life for? Freedom of religion? Or for freedom from religion? And how long will our other rights be secure if left to the whims of secular activists and unelected judges? The most consequential words for human freedom ever written are taken from the Declaration of Independence. They are, of course: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. This revolutionary proclamation -- that our rights come from our Creator -- is both the beginning and the heart of American Independence. It has preserved our freedom and our union from the Revolution, through the Civil War, the women's suffrage moment and the civil rights movement until today. But what about the future? As I mentioned in my first Winning the Future message to you back in April, the future cannot be left to chance. The future must be won. The Price of Freedom One of the greatest challenges we face is defending the unique civilization that the revolutionary declaration of our founding has produced. This challenge has become even greater, thanks to the foolishness and arrogance of the New York Times. As you probably know, the Times took it upon itself to reveal the existence of a classified anti-terrorism program we have been conducting since 2001 to monitor overseas banking transactions. Its purpose is critical: to follow the money that feeds the terrorism of the Irreconcilable Wing of Islam. The program was legal, and members of Congress -- from both parties -- had been briefed on its existence. As usual, the Times has used the well-worn argument of the "public interest" to justify this non-story. But in a remarkable letter to Managing Editor Bill Keller, Treasury Secretary John Snow eviscerates this tired argument with a higher "public interest": "What you've seemed to overlook is that it is also a matter of public interest that we use all means available -- lawfully and responsibly -- to help protect the American people from the deadly threats of terrorists." The New York Times does indeed have, as it repeatedly tells us, the constitutionally protected right of the free press. But it also has an obligation to be a responsible -- yes, even patriotic -- press. It has an obligation to consider the cost to freedom of its actions. 'The Mystic Chords of Memory' The challenges America faces this Independence Day remind me of the challenges the United States faced back in 1861. Then, following Abraham Lincoln's election as President in 1860, seven states of the deep South left the Union. The border states were on the verge of joining them. The Union that Lincoln would eventually give his life for was disintegrating before his eyes. In the midst of this challenge, Lincoln delivered his first inaugural address. It closes with an eloquent appeal to patriotism -- for all Americans to remember what was at stake in the gathering violence: We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature. Today we face a new threat to our Union. The long war against the Irreconcilable Wing of Islam will sometimes be fought on the battlefield of war. But more often it will take place in our words and our actions as a free people. Do we have the courage to defend our civilization from secularists who are intent on driving God from the public square? Will we remember the "public interest" that trumps our politics and our personal ambition: the preservation of our nation and our freedom? I am confident that we will. We will win the future. And the "mystic chords of memory" that bind us together as a nation will see us through our current challenge and challenges yet to come. God Bless you on this Independence Day, Your friend, Newt Gingrich