Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dexter Lives On who wrote (53148)	7/4/2006 12:18:46 PM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 197225

Mind providing some links/backup info? I can't imagine that Q would be so dull as to buy a pig in a poke.

To: Dexter Lives On who wrote (53148)	7/4/2006 12:19:00 PM
From: Dexter Lives On	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197225

For those under the illusion that Intel shut down IEEE 802.20 Mobile-Fi: ieee802.org Motorola & Samsung shut it down. The real powerhouses behind WiMAX are starting to show their hands. Intel was, and will continue to be, nothing more than a powerful adopter.... Tom Morrow 1.0 Summary Response: The appeal panel’s interpretation regarding the issue of approval threshold for the TSP was based on the meeting minutes of 802.20. Mr. Upton provided a reference that indicates the type of vote (procedural) was announced at the start of the session. The panel is open to a re-hearing or an agreement between the parties on that one narrow question. The appeal panel submits this response to Mr. Upton’s rehearing request because some of the arguments noted pertain to procedures that the panel believes it appropriately followed. If the EC believes the procedures (e.g., conducting closed deliberations, and issuing a clarification when requested and with no objection from the other party) were inappropriate, the panel requests that the EC provide clear guidance. Other than the narrow question noted above, the panel believes that there is no justification for a rehearing. If the EC determines that rehearing is appropriate, the Panel is, of course, prepared to reconvene in accordance with that decision and any guidance that it includes. In determining the appropriate relief, the Panel took into consideration the timing of further proceedings in 802.20. The Panel suggests that the EC arrange that any rehearing granted be completed by 1 PM on July 17, 2006 (Monday of the next Plenary Session). Any later time for completion of the rehearing would impact implementation of the Appeal Panel’s recommended remedy.