Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24351)	7/4/2006 6:13:03 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

LOL... it depends what kind of "evidence". On a serious note, there are all sorts of interesting comments, inquiries, hypothesis, etc. by very serious scientists pertaining to all the areas of science we've talked about on this thread. ALL of them started thinking about the issues because of various observations (anecdotal evidence) they've made. In fact most of science including what makes to the level of accepted theories start as anecdotal evidence (apple falling on head). To me, THAT is what is confusing about your (and of course to the Nth degree, Solon) "rejection" of much of what gets posted here. I mean if you don't want to discuss it, fine, but most of what has been discussed here has 'some' support by pretty smart people in the scientific community. If one thinks it's pie in the sky, one is probably better off just ignoring it rather than trying to prove otherwise... which, is almost never possible or scientists wouldn't be proposing or speaking of this stuff. DAK