Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (190967)	7/5/2006 12:10:11 PM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

< tanks and helicotper gunships and began shooting the place up> Give them their < real state > and do you think the terror attacks would cease ? Israel would then have been attacked by a sovreign state and would declare war. That should have been done anyway, as Nadine pointed out, awhile ago and would have had Sharon been in charge. Does there exist a leader with the vision and power to take the Pal's and build a nation instead of a breeding ground for hate and despair ? It is certainly not desired by any other Arabic nation.

To: bentway who wrote (190967)	7/5/2006 12:51:41 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine, if any other nation crossed the border of another with tanks and helicotper gunships and began shooting the place up, we might take issue US support for Israel has nothing to do with the issue. The Pals have been shelling Southern Israel. Then they attacked a border outpost and took a hostage. Chris, do you seriously think that if Mexico, say, began shelling San Diego from Tijuana, it would not engender a military response from the US? The right to reply to cross-border agression is well understood.