Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (190971)	7/6/2006 1:57:59 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 281500

Why don't you tell that to the 7 people, including a US diplomat, who were wounded when one of the detainees who WAS RELEASED from Gitmo quickly orchestrated that hotel boming in Pakistan. Not much sympathy being shown on your part for those victims.. What about THEIR RIGHTS?? And the rights of everyone not to have to live in fear of people who show all signs of having no remorse for wishing to kill "infidels"?? What about THEIR legal rights?? So is your theory that all the detainees in Gitmo should have been held there indefinitely because one or two of them is/was definitely dangerous? That's ridiculous. The Gitmo issue should be analyzed as a policy applied to a group, and whether it is appropriate. That one person who was released and then committed a crime doesn't justify continuing to hold hundreds of others. It justifies that HE should be caught and perhaps detained indefinitely without charge - nothing else.