Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CusterInvestor who wrote (15255)	7/5/2006 1:23:31 PM
From: silvertoad	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78416

but if the climatologist is emotional and the goldbug wise - then gold will go to $2000, and we'll remain nice and cool. -jb edit - question authority.

To: CusterInvestor who wrote (15255)	7/5/2006 1:44:21 PM
From: koan	Respond to of 78416

Thanks bigpike--I restrained myself-lol.

To: CusterInvestor who wrote (15255)	7/5/2006 1:47:46 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 78416

both could be wrong but one has the knowledge and training to look at the data, determine their relevance, make reasonable conclusions. The other lives on a hope and a dream. This doesn't mean one cannot be both a climatologist and a goldbug simultaneously, its just that in the first field, one bases his opinion on facts and in the other field on emotion.>>> Yes, but which is which? -g-

To: CusterInvestor who wrote (15255)	7/5/2006 5:59:39 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78416

- Yes both could be wrong but one has the knowledge and training to look at the data, determine their relevance, make reasonable conclusions. The other lives on a hope and a dream. You really think there is not enough history, facts and data to conclude logically that gold will absolutely trade at $2000 one day. I hope you are joking. - its just that in the first field, one bases his opinion on facts and in the other field on emotion. I disagree. I think there are facts and emotions in both case.