Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24367)	7/5/2006 6:33:19 PM
From: SiouxPal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Here's a good place I found to explain black holes. cosmology.berkeley.edu

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24367)	7/5/2006 6:33:23 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"When you argue that there could be another cycle of the universe that is undetectable to our current cycle, " I have not done that. I have only argued that what you claimed to be proven (an absolute gumball beginning) could be explained in other equally plausible ways, using your own logic and so is not at all proven. You have actually come around to the possibility of singularity at the beginning or repeated collapses and expansions, so I don't at all get what you are pointing at. A gumball sized Universe being an absolute beginning was the only argument that lacked informational support. That was your premise as I recall.